Publications

2019

Bjerring, J. C. K., & Gundersen, L. B. (2019). Higher-order knowledge and sensitivity. Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

Blackburn, P. R., Hasle, P., & Øhrstrøm, P. (red.) (2019). Logic and Philosophy of Time: Further Themes from Prior, Vol. 2. (1 udg.) Aalborg Universitetsforlag. Logic and Philosophy of Time, Bind. 2

Jakobsen, D. (2019). A.N. Prior and ‘The Nature of Logic’. History and Philosophy of Logic. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2019.1605479

Øhrstrøm, P. Synthese (2019). A critical discussion of Prior’s philosophical and tense-logical analysis of the ideas of indeterminism and human freedom.  Synthese (2019) 196: 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1149-2

2018

Engerer, V. P. & Sabir, F. (2018). Information professionals meet Arthur Prior. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 25 September 2018, Pages 1-18, http://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618799527.

Gundersen, L. B., & Gundersen, E. B. (2018). Conjunction Conditionalization and Irrelevant Semifactuals. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 7(4), 284-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.397

Gundersen, L. & Olesen, M. (2018). In Defence of a probabilistic semantics for counterfactuals. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 99, Issue 3, September 2018, Pages 538–549, http://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12193.

Hansen, J. U., Bolander, T., & Braüner, T. (2018). Many-valued hybrid logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, Volume 28, Issue 5, 20 July 2018, Pages 883–908, https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv040.

Øhrstrøm, P. & Jakobsen, D., ‘William of Ockham on Future Contingency,’ KronoScope, 18 (2018).https://brill.com/view/journals/kron/18/2/article-p138_4.xml

2017

Blackburn, P., Bolander, T., Braüner, T. & Jørgensen, K.F. (2017). Completeness and termination for a Seligman-style tableau system. Journal of Logic and Computation, Volume 27, Issue 1, 1 February 2017, Pages 81–107, https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv052.

Braüner, T. (2017). Hybrid Logic (substantive revised version). In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-hybrid/

Hasle, P., Blackburn, P., & Øhrstrøm, P. (editors). (2017) Logic and Philosophy of Time: Themes from Prior. Aalborg University Press (ISBN: 978-87-7112-674-7) http://aauforlag.dk/Shop/andre/antologier-og-monografier/logic-and-philosophy-of-time-themes-from-prio.aspx.

Hasle, P., Blackburn, P., & Øhrstrøm, P. (editors). (2017) Logic and Philosophy of Time: Themes from Prior. Aalborg University Press (ISBN: 978-87-7112-674-7) http://aauforlag.dk/Shop/andre/antologier-og-monografier/logic-and-philosophy-of-time-themes-from-prio.aspx.

Jakobsen, D., ‘The Significance of the Prior–Smart Correspondence for the Rise of Tense-Logic’, Logic and Philosophy of Time: Themes from Prior, Hasle P., Blackburn, P. & Øhrstrøm P., (red) Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Logic and Philosophy of Time, 1 (2017): 63-82.

Jakobsen D., Øhrstrøm P. & Hasle, P. ‘In Celebration of Past, Present and Future’ Logic and Philosophy of Time: Themes from Prior, Hasle P., Blackburn, P. & Øhrstrøm P., (red) Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Logic and Philosophy of Time, 1 (2017): 9-27.

Jakobsen, D. & Øhrstrøm, P., ‘The Prior – von Wright Debate on Anselm’s Ontological Argument’, In:On the Human Condition: Philosophical Essays in Honour of the Centennial Anniversary of Georg Henrik von Wright, Niiniluoto, I and Wallgren T, (red.), Acta Philosophica Fennica, Societas Philosophica Fennica, 93, (Helsinki:2017): 255-267.

2016

Hasle, P. & Øhrstrøm, P. (2016). Prior’s paradigm for the study of time and its methodological motivation. Synthese, Volume 193, Issue 11, November 2016, Pages 3401–3416, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-016-1161-6.

Jakobsen, D & Øhrstrøm P. (2016). Conceptual and Metaphysical Origins and Relevance of Temporal Logic. In: Dyreson, C., Hansen, R, M., Hunsberger L. (eds.): PROCEEDINGS, 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning — TIME 2016.
 
Øhrstrøm, P. (2016). A critical discussion of Prior’s philosophical and tense-logical analysis of the ideas of indeterminism and human freedom. Synthese, 23 June 2016, Pages 1–17, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1149-2.

Øhrstrøm, P., & Ploug, T. (2016). A. N. Prior’s Ideas on Keeping Track of Branching Time. In: Time and Trace: Multidisciplinary Investigations of Temporality. Brill (ISBN: 978-90-0431-572-3), Pages 179–196, http://doi.org./10.1163/9789004315723_011.

Logic and Philosophy of Time edited by Per Hasle, Patrick Blackburn and Peter Øhrstrøm

A.N. Prior (1914-69) in the course of the 1950s and 1960s founded a new and revolutionary paradigm in philosophy and logic. Its most central feature is the preoccupation with time and the development of the logic of time. However, this was inseparably interwoven with fundamental questions about human freedom, ethics, and existence. This remarkable integration of themes also embodies an original and in fact revolutionary conception of logic.

This e-book is the first volume in the book series, Logic and Philosophy of Time. The book series is dedicated to a deep investigation and also the further development of Prior’s paradigm.

The e-book is available througt open access at Aalborg Universitetsforlag